Copyable Report Scaffold — AEO Client Report

Use this scaffold as the starting structure for any AEO client report. Copy it, fill in the fields, and adapt to the specific engagement.

Report title: AEO Review — [Client Name] — [Month Year]
Prepared by: [Your name / Agency name]
Review period: [Start date] — [End date]
Pages reviewed: [Number] pages ([list URLs or attach page list])
Executive summary: [2–3 sentences: what was reviewed, what the main findings were, what the recommended next steps are]
Baseline metrics (pre-review):
— Total impressions (28-day): ___
— Total clicks (28-day): ___
— Top 5 queries by impressions: ___
— Schema status: [None / Present but unvalidated / Validated and aligned]
Structural findings per page:
— Page URL: ___
— Answer placement: [Present in first block / Buried / Missing]
— Heading clarity: [Specific / Generic / Mixed]
— Schema alignment: [Aligned / Misaligned / Missing]
— FAQ quality: [Strong / Weak / Absent]
— Gap notes: ___
Deliverables produced:
— Answer blocks: [count]
— Schema JSON-LD files: [count]
— Gap reports: [count]
Recommended next steps:
1. ___
2. ___
3. ___
Next review date: [Date]

Why AEO reporting is different from SEO reporting

Traditional SEO reporting centres on rankings, traffic, and conversions. AEO reporting needs to communicate a different kind of progress — structural improvement. The page may not rank higher after an AEO review, but it may be structurally clearer, better aligned to target queries, and more extractable by answer-driven systems. Reporting that only tracks rankings will miss the value of AEO work entirely.

The challenge for agencies is that clients understand traffic and rankings. They may not immediately understand why structural clarity matters. The reporting format has to bridge that gap — showing what changed, why it was changed, and what signals to monitor going forward.

The three layers of an AEO report

Effective AEO reports cover three layers, each aimed at a different stakeholder audience:

Layer 1 — Executive summary

A concise overview for decision-makers who do not read full reports. This should cover: how many pages were reviewed, the most significant structural gaps found, the deliverables produced, and the recommended next steps. Two to three sentences maximum.

Layer 2 — Structural findings

A per-page breakdown of what was reviewed and what was found. For each page: answer placement status, heading clarity assessment, schema alignment check, FAQ quality rating, and specific gap notes. This layer is for the implementation team — the people who will actually make the changes.

Layer 3 — Performance baseline and monitoring signals

The data layer that makes before/after comparison possible. Record baseline GSC impressions, clicks, top queries, and schema status before changes are made. After implementation, monitor the same metrics at 30, 60, and 90 days. The tracking AEO performance guide covers the monitoring approach in detail.

Common reporting mistakes to avoid

Using this template with AEO PRO Lab

AEO PRO Lab produces the structured outputs that populate this reporting template — answer blocks, schema validation, gap notes, and stakeholder summaries. The report scaffold above gives you the presentation layer. AEO PRO Lab gives you the content to fill it with. Together, they make the reporting process repeatable rather than reinvented for each client.

AEO PRO Lab produces the structured outputs that populate this report — consistently, for every page reviewed. The report template gives you the format. AEO PRO Lab gives you the content.

Request Free Access AEO Audit Template →

← All Resources